Literature Review in the Social Sciences: Instruction, Guides & Tutorials: Libraries of Adelphi

 

social science literature review

Understanding the Literature Review; Identifying Sources for the Literature Review; Finding Review and Research Articles; Putting it All Together. A literature review is likewise not a collection of quotes and paraphrasing from other sources. A good literature review should critically evaluate the quality and findings of the research. A good literature review should avoid the temptation of stressing the importance of a particular research program. Below you will find general guidelines to consider when developing a literature review in the field of social work. Because social work is a social science field, you will most likely be required to use APA style. Please see our APA materials for information on creating parenthetical citations and reference lists. 1.


Social Science Review


As part of their research program, many students are instructed to perform a literature review, without always understanding what a literature review is. Most are aware that it is a process of gathering information from other sources and documenting it, but few have any idea of how to evaluate the information, or how to present it. A literature review can be a precursor to the introduction of a research paperor it can be an entire paper in itself, acting as the first stage of large research projects and allowing the supervisor to ascertain that the student is on the correct path.

A literature review is a critical and in depth evaluation social science literature review previous research. It is a summary and synopsis of a particular area of research, allowing anybody reading the paper to establish why you are pursuing this particular research, social science literature review. A good literature review expands on the reasons behind selecting a particular research question.

A literature review is not simply a chronological catalog of all your sources, but an evaluation. It pulls the previous research together, and explains how it connects to the research proposed by the current paper. All sides of an argument must be clearly explained, to avoid bias, and areas of agreement and disagreement should be highlighted.

A literature review is likewise not a collection of quotes and paraphrasing from other sources. A good literature review should critically evaluate the quality and findings of the research, social science literature review. A good literature review should avoid the temptation of stressing the importance of a particular research program. The fact that a researcher is undertaking the research program speaks for its importance, and an educated reader may well be insulted that they are not allowed to judge the importance for themselves.

They want to be re-assured that it is a serious paper, not a pseudo-scientific sales advertisement, social science literature review. Whilst some literature reviews can be presented in a chronological order, this is best avoided. For example, a review of Victorian Age Physics may certainly present J.

Otherwise, this is usually perceived as being a little lazy, and it is better to organize the review around ideas and individual points. As a general rule, especially for a longer review, each paragraph should address one point, and present and evaluate all of the available evidence, from all possible differing points of view. Evaluating the credibility of sources is one of the most difficult aspects of a literature review, social science literature review, especially with the ease of finding information on the internet.

The only real way to evaluate is through experience, but there are luckily a few tricks for evaluating information quickly and accurately, social science literature review. There is such a thing as too much information. Google does not distinguish or judge the quality of results, only how search engine friendly a paper is.

This is why it is still good practice to begin research in an academic library. Any journals found there can be regarded as safe and credible. The next stage is to use the internet, and this is where the difficulties begin. It can be helpful to structure your internet research as if it were conducted on paper. The easiest way is to scan the work, using the abstract and introduction as guides.

This helps to eliminate the non-relevant work and also some of the lower quality research. If it sets off alarm bells, there may be something wrong, and the paper is probably of a low quality, social science literature review. But be very careful not to fall into the trap of rejecting research just because it conflicts with your hypothesis.

Failure to do this will completely invalidate the literature review and potentially undermine the research project. Any social science literature review that may be relevant should be moved to the shortlist folder. The next stage is to critically evaluate the paper and decide if the research is sufficient quality. A smaller number of quality sources is far preferable than a long but irrelevant list.

Check into the credentials of any source which you rely on heavily for the literature review. The reputation of the University or organization is a factor, as is the experience of the researcher.

If their name keeps cropping up, and they have written many papers, the source is probably OK. Look for agreements. Good research should have been replicated by other independent researchers, with similar results, showing that the information is fairly safe to use.

If the process is proving to be difficult and in some fields like medicine and environmental research, there is a lot of poor science do not be afraid to ask a supervisor for advice. They should know some trustworthy sources to look at. It may be a little extra work for them, but there will be even more work if they have to tear apart a review because it is built on shaky evidence. Conducting a good literature review takes patience and is a matter of practice.

Take solace that even the best scientists can fall into the trap of using poor evidence. If your research program is well constructed, a less-than-perfect literature review will not affect the results. Social science literature review out our quiz-page with tests about:.

Martyn Shuttleworth Sep 16, What is a Literature Review?. Retrieved Sep 08, from Explorable. The text in this article is licensed under the Creative Commons-License Attribution 4. That is it.

You can use it freely with some kind of linkand we're also okay with people reprinting in publications like books, social science literature review, blogs, newsletters, course-material, papers, wikipedia and presentations with clear attribution, social science literature review. Systematic Reviews. Meta Analysis. Research Paper Question. How to Write an Introduction. Want the full version to study at home, take to school or just scribble on?

Whether you are an academic novice, or you simply want to brush up your skills, this book will social science literature review your academic writing skills to the next level. Get Social science literature review. Download electronic versions: - Epub for mobiles and tablets - PDF version here.

Don't have time for it all now? Social science literature review problem, save it as a course and come back to it later. What is a Literature Review? Literature Review. Martyn Shuttleworth Don't miss these related articles:. Back to Overview "Research Design".

Full reference:. Related articles Related pages:. Search over articles on psychology, science, and experiments. Search this site :.

Leave this field blank :. Want to stay up to date? Follow us! Follow ExplorableMind. Footer bottom Explorable, social science literature review. Get all these articles in 1 guide Want the full version to study at home, take to school or just scribble on? Save this course for later Don't have time for it all now? Add to my courses. Complete Collection. Like Explorable? Take it with you wherever you go. Thank you to Innovation Norway. The Research Council of Norway.

This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon research and innovation programme under grant agreement No Social Twitter Facebook.

All rights reserved. Login Sign Up Privacy Policy.

 

What is a Literature Review?

 

social science literature review

 

Oct 23,  · Buy Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination 1st by Christopher Hart (ISBN: ) from Amazon's Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders/5(40). Science & Engineering. Social Sciences. NOTE: Unless otherwise noted, e-resources are limited to Penn faculty staff and students. In addition, limitations on use apply. Comparative Literature & Literary Theory - Article Indexes, E-Journals. Computers & Electronics. Writing a Literature Review in the Social Sciences Dr. Christopher N. Lawrence Visiting Assistant Professor of Political Science, Virginia Tech* October 11, Writing a literature review is one of the more mysterious parts of writing in the social sciences.